Art. 6 of the Constitution of the United States of 1871 and the Constitution of the U.S.A. Supremacy Clause between two Sovereign States, regarding Treaties & International Law.
Capitalist White Supremacist are having an anxiety attack because the Moors are the Regulators of the Treaties.
The Constitution of the Empire of Morocco
ARTICLE 2.
1. Moroccan shall be the nationality of the Moor.
PREAMBLE
We the Moroccan nationals solemnly proclaim our attachment to the peremptory
rights of the Moroccan territories throughout the Empire of Morocco. We, the
Moorish people of the land, declare our self-determination and the complete
emergence of our sovereign and independent Moorish Empire. Recalling that the
Empire State of Morocco recognized the European States by treaty relations, and in
like manner, the European States recognized themselves as being States of the
Sultan of Morocco.
We the Moors vow to take our place among the affairs of modern States in harmony
with the general rule of international law. Convinced that the Moorish State
Government has always been inspired by the interest attaching itself to the reign of
order, peace, and prosperity in Morocco. We pledge our allegiance and provincial
States to come under the original jurisdiction of this modern Moorish Constitution
as an international Act, to govern our ancient lands as one people; and one State.
We declare that the territorial and personal jurisdiction of the Moors shall be
protected, in good faith, by the provisions of Moroccan treaties, laws, and
regulations while cohabitating peacefully with other foreign States. We recognize
that the attainment thereof can only be effected by the introduction of reforms
based upon the triple principle of the sovereign independence of His Majesty the
Sultan, the integrity of his domains, and economic liberty without any inequality, as
·All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
·This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
·The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
·
·Is treaty law considered to be federal law pursuant to article 6 clause 2 of the united states constitution
·Treaty Law and Federal Law in the U.S. Constitution
·Overview Yes, treaty law is considered federal law under Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, commonly known as the Supremacy Clause.
Key Points
- **Supremacy Clause**: - Article VI, Clause 2 states: > "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
- Implications of the Supremacy Clause**: - Treaties made by the United States are binding on both federal and state courts. - Treaties take precedence over state laws and constitutions. - Federal law, including treaties, overrides conflicting state laws.
Conclusion - Federal Law Status**: Treaties ratified by the United States are considered part of federal law and have the same legal standing as federal statutes. - Judicial Enforcement**: Courts are required to uphold treaties as the supreme law of the land, ensuring consistency between federal and international obligations.
Additional Notes - Treaties must be ratified by a two-thirds majority in the Senate to become binding. - The President has the power to negotiate treaties, but they require Senate approval for ratification.
Summary In conclusion, treaty law is indeed federal law as established by Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. It plays a crucial role in the legal framework of the United States, particularly concerning international relations and obligations.
·
·Does federal treaties preempt federal, state, or local laws?
·Preemption of Laws by Federal Treaties
· Overview Federal treaties can preempt federal, state, and local laws, but the extent of this preemption depends on various factors, including the nature of the treaty and its implementation.
Key Points
- **Supremacy Clause**: - Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution establishes that treaties are the supreme law of the land. - This means that valid treaties can override conflicting laws at both the federal and state levels.
- **Types of Preemption**: - **Express Preemption**: - Occurs when a treaty explicitly states that it overrides existing laws. - **Implied Preemption**: - Arises when a treaty's purpose and objectives indicate that it should take precedence over state or local laws, even if not explicitly stated.
·Federal Law Preemption - **Federal Laws**: - If a federal law conflicts with a treaty, the treaty will generally prevail due to the Supremacy Clause. - However, if a federal law implements a treaty, the law typically governs in accordance with the treaty's terms.
State and Local Law Preemption - **State Laws**: - Treaties can preempt state laws if they conflict with the treaty's provisions. - States cannot enact laws that contradict federal treaties.
- **Local Laws**: - Local laws, being subordinate to state laws, are also preempted by federal treaties.
Limitations and Considerations - **Implementation**: - The ability of a treaty to preempt laws often depends on whether the treaty has been implemented through legislation or executive action. - **Judicial Interpretation**: - Courts play a role in interpreting treaties and determining the extent of their preemptive effect.
Conclusion - **Preemption Authority**: Federal treaties can preempt federal, state, and local laws, making them a significant source of law in the United States. - **Legal Framework**: The application of treaties and their preemptive effect is subject to judicial interpretation and the specifics of each treaty.
· Summary In summary, federal treaties have the potential to preempt conflicting federal, state, and local laws, reinforcing their status as the supreme law of the land.
·
·are Moorish subjects considered protected persons under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United states constitution?
·
·Moorish Subjects and the Fourteenth Amendment
· Overview The question of whether Moorish subjects are considered "protected persons" under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution is complex and involves legal interpretation of citizenship and rights.
Key Points
- **Fourteenth Amendment**: - Ratified in 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment includes several important clauses regarding citizenship and rights: - **Citizenship Clause**: Grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States. - **Due Process Clause**: Provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. - **Equal Protection Clause**: Prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
- **Moorish American Identity**: - The term "Moorish subjects" often refers to individuals who identify as part of the Moorish community, particularly those who associate with the Moorish Science Temple of America. - Some Moorish groups claim a unique status, often asserting that they have distinct rights and identities that differ from mainstream citizenship.
Legal Context
- **Citizenship**: - The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to all individuals born in the U.S., including those of African descent. - However, self-identifying as "Moorish" does not automatically confer or negate citizenship status under U.S. law.
- **Court Rulings**: - Courts have generally ruled that self-identification as a Moorish subject does not exempt individuals from the laws applicable to citizens and residents of the United States. - The legal system does not recognize a separate legal status for Moorish Americans that would provide them with different rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Conclusion
- **Protected Persons**: - Moorish subjects, if they are born or naturalized in the U.S., are generally considered protected persons under the Fourteenth Amendment, enjoying the same rights as other citizens.
- **Legal Recognition**: - Claims of unique rights or statuses based on Moorish identity have not been widely accepted in U.S. courts and do not alter the protections afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Summary In conclusion, while Moorish subjects may identify with a distinct cultural or national heritage, they are typically considered protected persons under the Fourteenth Amendment if they meet the criteria of citizenship. Legal recognition of their unique claims remains limited in the context of U.S. law.
·
·Moroccan nationality obsolete and without effect.
· A U.S. note of Mar. 17, 1959, addressed to the Moroccan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, referred to a note from ,the Ministry dated Oct. 8, 1958, in which the Embassy had been informed that the Moroccan Government had decided to strike all prescriptions relating to Moroccan nationality from the text of the Madrid convention. The·U.S. note said, in part: "The Government of the United States of America, having unilaterally relinquished certain rights in Morocco with the reemergence of Morocco into independence in 1956, considers that in line with historical developments Article XV of the Madrid Convention on Protection of 1880 has become obsolete and without effect. "The Government of the United States takes due cognizance, therefore, of the action taken by the Moroccan Government as set forth in its above cited Note, which the United States Government understands to refer only to Article XV of the Madrid Convention on Protection of 1880.
