“To acquiesce, or not to acquiesce… that is the question!”
This study session examines whether Black‑a‑Moors (Moorish descendants in America) have historically:
Amnesia — forgetting treaty identity
Cognitive Dissonance — conflict between belief and truth
Acquiescence — silent consent, paralysis, procrastination
Defined as tacit consent, inferred from silence, delay, or failure to assert rights.
2013 — Shelby County v. Holder weakened Section 5
2026 — Louisiana v. Callais weakened Section 2 These rulings disproportionately affect naturalized “colored” populations.
Naturalization laws created a racial caste system:
1790 — “free white persons” only
1870 — added Africans
1952 — McCarran‑Walter Act
1965 — Hart‑Celler Act (ended national origins quotas)
Both publicly acknowledged that Black Americans are Moors with historical ties to Morocco.
Topics raised:
Malcolm X
Political oppression
Economic exploitation
Social degradation
Unity around nationality
Pan‑Africanism vs. Moorish identity
“What is our flag, constitution, by‑laws, values?”
Can there be a “Black Vote Day”?
“You should think like a Moor and NOT as blacks.”
Any Moroccan subject naturalized abroad who returns must:
Submit to Moroccan law, or
Leave Morocco, unless naturalization was approved by Morocco.
Naturalization already acquired continues with full effect.
Germany challenged French influence in Morocco. The crisis was resolved by the Algeciras Conference (1906), affirming:
Sovereignty of the Sultan
Integrity of Moroccan domains
Economic liberty without inequality
This conference later became central in the ICJ’s 1952 ruling.
Morocco (the State and its Moorish Government) acquiesced by not enforcing its own laws and consular courts against U.S. officials.
12 Powers exercised consular jurisdiction
U.S. jurisdiction existed through most‑favored‑nation clauses
Other nations exercised jurisdiction through Moroccan consent or acquiescence
“Confiscation, fines, or penalties must be imposed on foreigners by consular jurisdiction, and on Moorish subjects by Shereefian jurisdiction.”
Morocco allowed foreign courts to operate instead of enforcing its own laws, creating a long‑term pattern of acquiescence.
Defines eligibility for naturalization and the oath renouncing foreign sovereignty.
Who is involved?
Which party holds authority?
What is agreed?
How disputes are resolved.
State — Empire of Morocco
Government — Moorish Government
People — Moroccans
Short Title — Moors
Collective Identity — We the People
A mark of dignity or distinction.
Implied consent through silence.
Tacit consent
Knowledge without objection
Failure to assert rights
Passive compliance
Silent appearance of consent
Black‑a‑Moors may be experiencing amnesia, cognitive dissonance, or acquiescence.
Voting rights have been systematically weakened (2013, 2026).
Naturalization laws created a racial caste system.
UNDRIP affirms nationality and self‑determination for indigenous peoples.
ICJ (1952) shows Morocco historically acquiesced to foreign jurisdiction.
Moorish nationality requires assertion, not silence.
Unity must form around one State, one Government, one Nationality, one Flag.
» The L.A.W. of the Empire of Morocco