Browse the glossary using this index

Special | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ALL

A

ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION) DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION UNDER ARTICLE 63 OF THE STATUTE SUBMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SEPTEMBER 7, 2022


AMPAC Study Session Board: Study Session (165)

  • Moor, in English usage, a Moroccan...
 
  • Article III Section 2 Clause 1 Cases or Controversies The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
 
  • Article VI Supreme Law Clause 2 Supremacy Clause This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
 
  • Fifth Amendment Substantive Due Process No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
 
  • The Slave Trade Act 1807 abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, but it was not until the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 that the institution of slavery was abolished, freeing more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean and South Africa as well as a small number in Canada. The Slavery Abolition Act received Royal Assent on August 28, 1833, and took effect on August 1, 1834. The British were the biggest proponents of the abolition of slavery worldwide by the late eighteenth century, having previously been the world's largest slave dealers
 
  • modus operandi
modus operandi, in criminology, distinct pattern or manner of working that comes to be associated with a particular criminal.
 
  • The term is often used in police work when discussing crime and addressing the methods employed by criminals. It is also used in criminal profiling, where it can help in finding clues to the offender's psychology. It largely consists of examining the actions used by the individuals to execute the crime, prevent its detection and facilitate escape. A suspect's modus operandi can assist in their identification, apprehension, or repression, and can also be used to determine...
 
  • Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford, Dred Scott v. Sandford
 
“The Southern opinion upon the subject of Southern slavery,” trumpeted one Georgia newspaper, “is now the supreme law of the land,” and opposition to it is “morally treason against the Government.” The view that Southern ideologues such as John C. Calhoun had promoted for more than a decade—that the federal government had a positive, indeed a constitutional, obligation to defend slavery.
 
Not surprisingly, the North exploded in denunciations of Taney’s opinion. Several sober appraisals in the Northern press decimated the chief justice’s tortured legal reasoning. The Republican editor Horace Greeley published Justice Curtis’s dissent as a pamphlet to be used in the elections of 1858 and 1860. The press and pulpit echoed with attacks on the decision that were as heated as Southern defenses of it. Taney’s hopes of settling the issue lay smashed. If anything, Scott v. Sandford inflamed passions and brought the Union even closer to dissolving.
 
For all practical purposes, Northern courts and politicians rejected Scott v. Sandford as binding. In an advisory opinion, Maine’s high court declared that African Americans could vote in both state and federal elections. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that any slave coming into the state with his master’s consent, even as a sojourner, became free and could not be reenslaved upon returning to a slave state; the New York Court of Appeals handed down a similar ruling in Lemmon v. The People (1860). In several states, legislatures resolved to prohibit slavery in any form from crossing onto their soil and enacted legislation freeing slaves passing within their borders.
 
Taney is remembered now almost solely for the blatantly pro-slavery decision he wrote and for his demeaning comments about African Americans. When he died in 1864, he was roundly denounced and vilified in the North. Republican Sen. Charles Sumner of Massachusetts predicted that “the name of Taney is to be hooted down the page of history.” Whatever else he may have done, his name will always be linked with that of a slave who wanted nothing more than his freedom.
 
Dred Scott did, in fact, get his freedom, but not through the courts. After he and his wife were later bought by the Blow family (who had sold Scott to Emerson in the first place), they were freed in 1857. Scott died of tuberculosis in St. Louis the following year. Harriet Scott lived until June 1876, long enough to see the Civil War and the Thirteenth Amendment (1865) abolish slavery in the United States.
 
Missouri Compromise, (1820), in U.S. history, measure worked out between the North and the South and passed by the U.S. Congress that allowed for admission of Missouri as the 24th state (1821). It marked the beginning of the prolonged sectional conflict over the extension of slavery that led to the American Civil War.
 
The territory of Missouri first applied for statehood in 1817, and by early 1819 Congress was considering enabling legislation that would authorize Missouri to frame a state constitution. When Rep. James Tallmadge of New York attempted to add an antislavery amendment to that legislation on February 13, 1819, however, there ensued an ugly and rancorous debate over slavery and the government’s right to restrict slavery. The Tallmadge amendment prohibited the further introduction of slaves into Missouri and provided for emancipation of those already there when they reached age 25. The amendment passed the House of Representatives, controlled by the more-populous North, but failed in the Senate, which was equally divided between free and slave states. Congress adjourned without resolving the Missouri question.
 
The following summer a considerable body of public opinion in the North was rallied in support of the Tallmadge proposal. Much of that anti-Missouri sentiment, as it was called, arose from a genuine conviction that slavery was morally wrong. Political expediency was mixed with moral convictions. Many of the leading anti-Missouri men had been active in the Federalist party, which seemed to be in the process of disintegration; it was charged that they were seeking an issue on which to rebuild their party. The Federalist leadership of the anti-Missouri group caused some northern Democrats to reconsider their support of the Tallmadge amendment and to favour a compromise that would thwart efforts to revive the Federalist party.
 
When it reconvened in December 1819, Congress was faced with a request for statehood from Maine. At the time, there were 22 states, half of them free states and half of them slave states. The Senate passed a bill allowing Maine to enter the Union as a free state and Missouri to be admitted without restrictions on slavery. Sen. Jesse B. Thomas of Illinois then added an amendment that allowed Missouri to become a slave state but banned slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase north of latitude 36°30′. Henry Clay then skillfully led the forces of compromise, engineering separate votes on the controversial measures. On March 3, 1820, the decisive votes in the House admitted Maine as a free state, Missouri as a slave state, and made free soil all western territories north of Missouri’s southern border.
 
When the Missouri constitutional convention empowered the state legislature to exclude free blacks and mulattoes, however, a new crisis was brought on. Enough northern congressmen objected to the racial provision that Clay was called upon to formulate the Second Missouri Compromise. On March 2, 1821, Congress stipulated that Missouri could not gain admission to the Union until it agreed that the exclusionary clause would never be interpreted in such a way as to abridge the privileges and immunities of U.S. citizens. Missouri so agreed and became the 24th state on August 10, 1821; Maine had been admitted the previous year on March 15.
 
Although slavery had been a divisive issue in the United States for decades, never before had sectional antagonism been so overt and threatening as it was in the Missouri crisis. Thomas Jefferson described the fear it evoked as “like a firebell in the night.” Although the compromise measures appeared to settle the slavery-extension issue, John Quincy Adams noted in his diary, “Take it for granted that the present is a mere preamble—a title page to a great, tragic volume.” Sectional conflict would grow to the point of civil war after the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) and was declared unconstitutional in the Dred Scott decision of 1857..
 
  • Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786
Article 6.
If any Moor shall bring Citizens of the United States or their Effects to His Majesty, the Citizens shall immediately be set at Liberty & the Effects restored & in like Manner, if any Moor not a Subject of these Dominions, shall make Prize of any of the Citizens of America or their Effects, & bring them into any of the Ports of His Majesty, they shall be immediately released as they will then be considered as under His Majesty’s Protection.
 
  • Library of Congress the Dred Scott decision (Please see: Dread Scott within this glossary in the D section)
5. When the Constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the States as members of the community which constituted the State, and were nut numbered among its “people or citizen.” Consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. And not being “citizens” within the meaning of the Constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the United States, and the Circuit Court has not jurisdiction in such a suit..
 
APPENDIX. [From the New York Day-Book, Nov. 10,1857.] NATURAL HISTORY OF THE PROGNATHOUS SPECIES OF MANKIND. BY DR. SAMUEL A. CARTWRIGHT, OF NEW ORLEANS.
Samuel Adolphus Cartwright (November 3, 1793 – May 2, 1863) was an American physician who practiced in Mississippi and Louisiana in the Antebellum era United States. Cartwright is best known as the inventor of the 'mental illness' of Drapetomania—the desire of a slave for freedom...
 
When all, or a greater part of the face is thrown anterior to the line, the negro approximates the monkey anatomically more than he does the true Caucasian; and when little or none of the face is anterior to the line, he approximates that mythical being of Dr. Van Evrie, a black white man, and almost ceases to be a negro The black man occasionally seen in Africa, called the Bature Dudu, with high nose, thin lips, and long straight hair, is not a negro at all, but a Moor tanned by the climate...
 
the United States for having officiously destroyed the value of negro property in Africa by breaking up the only trade that ever protected the native Africans against the butcheries, cruelties and oppressions of their mulatto, Moorish and Mahommedan tyrants It is these butcheries and cruelties, and the little care taken of the black man in Africa, the last fifty years, since he became valueless through British and American philanthropy, that lie at the root of the depopulating process which is going on in the dark land of the Niger..
 
 
  • MOROCCO GENERAL TREATY between Great Britain and Morocco. Signed, in the English and Arabic languages, at Tangier, December 9, 1856.
 
Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and His Majesty the Sultan of Morocco and Fez, being desirous to maintain and strengthen the relations of friendship which have long subsisted between their respective dominions and subjects, have resolved to proceed to a revision and improvement of the Treaties subsisting between the respective countries, and have for that purpose named as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say:.
 
XU. All British subjects, whether Mahometans, Jews, or Christians, shall alike enjoy all the rights and privileges granted by the present Treaty and the Convention of Commerce and Navigation which has also been concluded this day, or which shall at any time be granted to the most favoured nation.
 
XIV. In all criminal cases, differences, disputes, or other causes of litigation arising between British subjects and the subjects or citizens of other foreign nations, no Governor, Kadi, or other Moorish authority shall have a right to interfere, unless a Moorish subject may have received thereby any injury to his pe or property, in which case the Moorish authority, or one of a aco shall have a right to be present at the tribunal of the consul.
 
Such cases shall be decided solely in the tribunals of the foreign Consuls, without the interference of the Moorish Government, according to the established usages which have hitherto been acted upon or may hereafter be arranged between such Consuls.
 
XVI. No British subject professing the Mahometan faith, or who may have professed the Mahometan religion, shall be considered as having in any manner lost, or as being by reason thereof in any degree less entitled to, the rights and privileges, or the full protection, enjoyed by British subjects who are Christians; but all British subjects, whatever their religion may be, shall enjoy all the rights and privileges secured by the present Treaty to British subjects, without any distinction or difference.
 
XIX. The present if shall apply generally to all the dominions of Her Britannic Majesty, and to all subjects who are under her obedience, and all those who inhabit any town or place. which is considered part of her kingdom, as also to all her subjects in Gibraltar and its inhabitants, and likewise to the inhabitants of the United States of the Ionian Islands which are under her protection; and all those who are called or described as English, shall be considered as British subjects, without any distinction between those born in and those born out of Great Britain: And if the Queen of Great Britain should hereafter possess a town or a country which, either by conquest or by Treaty, shall enter under her authority, all its people and inhabitants shall be considered as British subjects, even if only for the first time subjected to Great Britain.
 
XX. The subjects of the Queen of Great Britain, and those who are under her government or protection, shall have the full benefit of the privileges and of the particular favours granted by this Treaty, and which may be allowed to the subjects of other nations that are at war with Great Britain; and if, after this date, any other privileges shall be granted to any other Power, the same shall be extended and apply to, and in favour of, all British subjects in every respect, as to the subjects of such other Power.
 
RIGHT OF PROTECTION IN MOROCCO Convention signed at Madrid July 3,1880
Having recognized the necessity of establishing, on fixed and uniform bases, the exercise of the right of protection in Morocco, and, of settling certain questions connected therewith,
 

ARTICLE l' The conditions under which protection may be conceded are those established in the British and Spanish treaties with the Government of Morocco, and in the convention made between that Government, France and other powers in 1863, with the modification introduced by the present convention..

 
A U.S. note of Feb. 13, 1914, addressed to the French Ambassador at Washington, stated in part: "The provisions of the convention of 1863 appear to be substantially the same as the 'regulations relative to protection adopted by common consent by the Legation of France and the Government of Morocco, August 19, 1963,' reprinted in 'Treaties in Force, 1904,' at the end of the Madrid convention.... The British and Spanish treaties mentioned in Article I of the Madrid convention are presumably the general treaty of December 9, 1856, between Great Britain and Morocco, and the treaty of commerce and navigation of November 20, 1861, between Spain and Morocco." (1914 For. ReI. 909.) For background, see II Hackworth554. For text of the 1863 regulations, see p. 78; for the general treaty of Dec. 9, 1856, between Great Britain and Morocco, see British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 46, p. 176; for the' treaty of commerce and navigation of Nov. 20, 1861, between Spain and Morocco, see Ibid., vol. 53, p. 1089.
 
ART. 15 Any subject of Morocco who has been naturalized in a foreign country, and who shall return to Morocco, shall after having remained for a length of time equal to that which shall have been regularly necessary for him to obtain such naturalization, choose between entire submission to the laws of the Empire and the obligation to quit Morocco, unless it shall be proved that his naturalization in a foreign country was obtained with the consent of the Government of Morocco.
 
Foreign naturalization heretofore acquired by subjects of Morocco according to the rules established by the laws of each country shall be continued to them as regards all its effects without any restriction.
 
 
 

AMPAC Study Session Board: Study Session (166)

                                    The Supremacy Clause of Law
Royal Flush  image.png          V.            Straight Flush image%20%281%29.png
A. E.O.M. Constitution                                                                      9. U.S. Constitution
K. Act of Algeciras                                                                            8. Act of Algeciras
Q. Madrid Convention                                                                     7. Madrid Convention
J. Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1836                                            6. Treaty of Peace and                                                                                                                             Friendship 1836
10. Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786                                         5. Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786
Moroccan Nationality                                       V.                                              American Nationality

· The Supremacy Clause or supreme law supersedes, overrules, or
preempts inferior laws and inferior procedures.
· Frivolity - Search
· Empire of Morocco Constitution, 2004

·
· Right of protection in Morocco

Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786
Article 6.
If any Moor shall bring Citizens of the United States or their Effects to His
Majesty, the Citizens shall immediately be set at Liberty & the Effects
restored & in like Manner, if any Moor not a Subject of these Dominions,
shall make Prize of any of the Citizens of America or their Effects, & bring
them into any of the Ports of His Majesty, they shall be immediately
released as they will then be considered as under His Majesty’s Protection.

Library of Congress The Dred Scott decision

5. When the Constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of
the States as members of the community which constituted the State, and
were nut numbered among its “people or citizen.” Consequently, the
special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them.
And not being “citizens” within the meaning of the Constitution, they are not
entitled to sue in that character in a court of the United States, and the
Circuit Court has not jurisdiction in such a suit..

APPENDIX. [From the New York Day-Book, Nov. 10,1857.] NATURAL
HISTORY OF THE PROGNATHOUS SPECIES OF MANKIND. BY DR.
SAMUEL A. CARTWRIGHT, OF NEW ORLEANS.
Samuel Adolphus Cartwright (November 3, 1793 – May 2, 1863) was an
American physician who practiced in Mississippi and Louisiana in the
antebellum United States. Cartwright is best known as the inventor of the
'mental illness' of drapetomania—the desire of a slave for freedom...

When all, or a greater part of the face is thrown anterior to the line, the
negro approximates the monkey anatomically more than he does the true
Caucasian; and when little or none of the face is anterior to the line, he
approximates that mythical being of Dr. Van Evrie, a black white man, and
almost ceases to be a negro The black man occasionally seen in Africa,
called the Bature Dudu, with high nose, thin lips, and long straight hair, is
not a negro at all, but a Moor tanned by the climate...

the United States for having officiously destroyed the value of negro
property in Africa by breaking up the only trade that ever protected the
native Africans against the butcheries, cruelties and oppressions of their
mulatto, Moorish and Mahommedan tyrants It is these butcheries and
cruelties, and the little care taken of the black man in Africa, the last fifty
years, since he became valueless through British and American
philanthropy, that lie at the root of the depopulating process which is going
on in the dark land of the Niger..

black-a-moor - Search

MOROCCO
GENERAL TREATY between Great Britain and Morocco. Signed, in the
English and Arabic languages, at Tangier, December 9, 1856.

Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland,
and His Majesty the Sultan of Morocco and Fez, being desirous to maintain
and strengthen the relations of friendship which have long subsisted
between their respective dominions and subjects, have resolved to proceed
to a revision and improvement of the Treaties subsisting between the
respective countries, and have for that purpose named as their
Plenipotentiaries, that is to say:.

XU. All British subjects, whether Mahometans, Jews, or Christians, shall
alike enjoy all the rights and privileges granted by the present Treaty and
the Convention of Commerce and Navigation which has also been
concluded this day, or which shall at any time be granted to the most
favoured nation.

XIV. In all criminal cases, differences, disputes, or other causes of litigation
arising between British subjects and the subjects or citizens of other foreign
nations, no Governor, Kadi, or other Moorish authority shall have a right to
interfere, unless a Moorish subject may have received thereby any injury to
his pe or property, in which case the Moorish authority, or one of a aco
shall have a right to be present at the tribunal of the

consul.

Such cases shall be decided solely in the tribunals of the foreign Consuls,
without the interference of the Moorish Government, according to the

established usages which have hitherto been acted upon, or may hereafter
be arranged between such Consuls.

XVI. No British subject professing the Mahometan faith, or who may have
professed the Mahometan religion, shall be considered as having in any
manner lost, or as being by reason thereof in any degree less entitled to,
the rights and privileges, or the full protection, enjoyed by British subjects
who are Christians; but all British subjects, whatever their religion may be,
shall enjoy all the rights and privileges secured by the present Treaty to
British subjects, without any distinction or difference.

XIX. The present if shall apply generally to all the dominions of Her
Britannic Majesty, and to all subjects who are under her obedience, and all
those who inhabit any town or place. which is considered part of her
kingdom, as also to all her subjects in Gibraltar and its inhabitants, and
likewise to the inhabitants of the United States of the Ionian Islands which
are under her protection; and all those who are called or described as
English, shall be considered as British subjects, without any distinction
between those born in and those born out of Great Britain: And if the
Queen of Great Britain should hereafter possess a town or a country which,
either by conquest or by Treaty, shall enter under her authority, all its
people and inhabitants shall be considered as British subjects, even if only
for the first time subjected to Great Britain.

XX. The subjects of the Queen of Great Britain, and those who are under
her government or protection, shall have the full benefit of the privileges
and of the particular favours granted by this Treaty, and which may be
allowed to the subjects of other nations that are at war with Great Britain;
and if, after this date, any other privileges shall be granted to any other
Power, the same shall be extended and apply to, and in favour of, all British
subjects in every respect, as to the subjects of such other Power.

RIGHT OF PROTECTION IN MOROCCO Convention signed at Madrid
July 3,1880
Having recognized the necessity of establishing, on fixed and uniform
bases, the exercise of the right of protection in Morocco, and, of settling
certain questions connected therewith,

ARTICLE l' The conditions under which protection may be conceded are
those established in the British and Spanish treaties with the Government
of Morocco, and in the convention made between that Government, France
and other powers in 1863, with the modification introduced by the present
convention..

A U.S. note of Feb. 13, 1914, addressed to the French Ambassador at
Washington, stated in part: "The provisions of the convention of 1863
appear to be substantially the same as the 'regulations relative to
protection adopted by common consent by the Legation of France and the
Government of Morocco, August 19, 1963,' reprinted in 'Treaties in Force,
1904,' at the end of the Madrid convention.... The British and Spanish
treaties mentioned in Article I of the Madrid convention are presumably the
general treaty of December 9, 1856, between Great Britain and Morocco,
and the treaty of commerce and navigation of November 20, 1861,
between Spain and Morocco." (1914 For. ReI. 909.) For background, see II
Hackworth554. For text of the 1863 regulations, see p. 78; for the general
treaty of Dec. 9, 1856, between Great Britain and Morocco, see British and
Foreign State Papers, vol. 46, p. 176; for the' treaty of commerce and
navigation of Nov. 20, 1861, between Spain and Morocco, see Ibid., vol.
53, p. 1089.

ART. 15 Any subject of Morocco who has been naturalized in a foreign
country, and who shall return to Morocco, shall after having remained for a
length of time equal to that which shall have been regularly necessary for
him to obtain such naturalization, choose between entire submission to the
laws of the Empire and the obligation to quit Morocco, unless it shall be

proved that his naturalization in a foreign country was obtained with the
consent of the Government of Morocco.

Foreign naturalization heretofore acquired by subjects of Morocco
according to the rules established by the laws of each country shall be
continued to them as regards all its effects without any restriction.

C O N S T I T U T I O N

FOR THE

EMPIRE OF MOROCCO

1) Drafted on February 1, 2024
2) Signed by the Seyaraha’s on February 29, 2024
3) Signed by the Wazir’s on February 29, 2024
4) Election Day for the Sultan May 12, 2024
5) Declaration of Independence by the Sultan May 13,
2024
6) Constitution signed by the Sultan on June 3, 2024
7) Public Inauguration of the Sultan on June 8, 2024
8) Promulgated to the Empire by the Sultan on June 8,
2024
9) Deposited at the United Nations on June 13, 2024
10). Notification to the United States of America,
France,
United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Denmark,
Netherlands, Sweden, Austria, Hungry, Italy, Belgium,
Russia, His Catholic Majesty of the Holy See, the
Kingdom of Morocco, and Canada on June 13, 2024.

CONTENTS

PREAMBLE………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Pg. 2
Title 1: THE EMPIRE OF MOROCCO EXTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY AND
INDEPENDENCE………………. Pg. 4
Title 2: HIS MAJESTY THE SULTAN OF THE EMPIRE OF MOROCCO ………………………. Pg.5
Title 3: THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE GOVERNMENT………………………………………………. Pg.6
Title 4: THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT ………………………………….… Pg.11
Title 5: HOUSE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH …………………………………. Pg.12
Title 6: RELATIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE HOUSE……………. Pg.15
Title 7: APPLICATION AND OBSERVATION OF TREATIES AND INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Pg.23
Title 8: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL………………………………………………..………….…... Pg.24
Title 9: THE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY……………………………………………………….……………………. Pg.26
Title 10: THE HIGH COURT OF THE HOUSE……………..………………………………………………… Pg.29
Title 11: THE CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF THE GOVERNMENT ………………………………. Pg.30
Title 12: THE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL……………. Pg.30
Title 13: THE DEFENDER OF RIGHTS……………………………………….…………………………………. Pg.31
Title 14: TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OR TRUST TERRITORIES ……………………. Pg.32
Title 15: TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR TRUST TERRITORIES AND THE
RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION OF COLONIZED MOORISH PEOPLES ……. Pg.37
Title 16: PARTICIPATION OF THE EMPIRE OF MOROCCO IN TREATY RELATIONS
WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND UNIONS……………………………………………………… Pg.38
Title 17: DIVERSITY OF JURISDICTION
DISPUTES……………………………………..……………………………… Pg.39
Title 18: THE CEDING OF SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORIES TO THE
EMPIRE……..……………………… Pg.40

Title 19: AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION…………………………………………..……… Pg.40
PR E A MB L E
We the Moroccan nationals solemnly proclaim our attachment to the peremptory rights of
the Moroccan territories throughout the Empire of Morocco. We, the Moorish people of
the land, declare our self-determination and the complete emergence of our sovereign
and independent Moorish Empire. [BR1] Recalling that the Empire State of Morocco
recognized the European States by treaty relations, and in like manner, the European
States recognized themselves as being States of the Sultan of Morocco. [BR2]
We the Moors vow to take our place among the affairs of modern States in harmony with
the general rule of international law.[BR3] Convinced that the Moorish State Government
has always been inspired by the interest attaching itself to the reign of order, peace, and
prosperity in Morocco. We pledge our allegiance and provincial States to come under the
original jurisdiction of this modern Moorish Constitution as an international Act, to govern
our ancient lands as one people; and one State. [BR4]
We declare that the territorial and personal jurisdiction of the Moors shall be protected, in
good faith, by the provisions of Moroccan treaties, laws, and regulations while
cohabitating peacefully with other foreign States. We recognize that the attainment
thereof can only be affected by the introduction of reforms based upon the triple principle
of the sovereign independence of His Majesty the Sultan, the integrity of his domains, and
economic liberty without any inequality, as enshrined in the International Conference of
the 1906 General Act of Algeciras. [BR5]
Moreover, His Shereefian Majesty and the Moorish State Government herein reclaim the
uti possidetis territorial land, air, and sea rights as erga omnes obligations throughout the
Moorish Empire. We shall enjoy an autonomous political jurisdiction with a governmental
institution founded by a democratic form of liberty, equality, and just protections for our
economic and social development henceforth. [BR6]
For these reasons, we the indigenous Moroccans of the furthest west of the Maghreb
Empire hereby recognize the full Powers of His Majesty the Sultan, [BR7] and in like manner,
His Majesty the Sultan recognizes the Moroccan nationality of the Moors and reinstates
the administration of the Moorish Government, and the competent Consular Court judges,
throughout the Empire of Morocco. [BR8] May the sovereign authority of the Moorish
Government intervene against bad actors, and help bring economic, social, and police
protections for all people in need. May the fez and beret of the Moors symbolize a
trusted partnership for the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Whereas the Moors
may be humanity's last hope of peace. [BR9]

[BR1]Proclaim Our nationality and Declare our independence
[BR2]Remembering the Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1787-1836 The Sultan in that time
Sidi Muhammad recognized the United States of America which the real identity is British
refugees looking for a new home here in Morocco not America because America is in
Morocco..
[BR3]We have Declared our Presidents in the International World and have re emerged the
Empire for Moroccan Nationals to Self Govern their territories and follow the Rules of
International Law thru the United Nations Charter and treaties Set forth for Moroccan Law.
[BR4]We have Declared our Presidents in the International World and have reemerged the
Empire for Moroccan Nationals to Self Govern their territories and follow the Rules of
International Law thru the United Nations Charter and treaties Set forth for Moroccan Law.
[BR5]Sultan will govern his Domain(Territories) and reign in the Order to help the Moors of
their Moroccan territories(States) Decolonizes peacefully while remembering the Treaty's
and there Provisions that insure a quality life for both American and Moroccans which is in
the Act of Algeciras 1906.
[BR6]The Sultan along with the Shereefian or Makhzen shall have the land of Morocco
returned and sheltered by his Majesty the Sultan and Shereefian of Morocco. The Majesty
and Shereefian shall have the full Power to Govern the land in a democratic form of liberty.
[BR7]The Moroccans recognized the Sultan has Full Power and is over the Empire of
Morocco.
[BR8]The Sultan has now recognized the Moroccans along with their States
[BR9]“All Hail the Empire” a Prayer and a Mission to bring Peace freedom and justice for all
Humanity “Everywhere in the Empire”


AMPAC Study Session Board: Study Session (167)

1.      Who’s the original Sovereign States?

Empire of Morocco  or  the U.S.A.

 

2.      Who has subject matter Jurisdiction?

Empire of Morocco  or  U.S.A.

 

3.      What’s the nationality of the parties?

Moroccans  and  Americans

 

4.      What’s the nationality of the Judges?

Moroccan Judges  and  American Judges

 

5.      Which Rule of Law is permissible?

Moroccan Law  or  American Law

 

6.      Which court can hear the merits?

Moroccan Consular Court  or  American Court

 

7.      France  v.  U.S.A. 1952: The Judgment Held:

 By that way, and that way only can Moroccan Laws be enforced against the United States and its nationals so long as the Consular Jurisdiction is exercised.

Supremacy Clause 

Question: What is the purpose and intent of the supremacy clause (i.e., supreme law), supremacy language, or procedure?

Answer: Supremacy Clause (i.e., supreme law) supersedes, overrule procedures.

 

Q: What is the mission and vision of the Moors?

A: Complete Decolonization of Sovereign and Independent Country of the Empire of Morocco pursuant to the triple principle of the Act of Algeciras, as follows:

1.      Sovereignty and independence. (State-Const.)

2.      Integrity of domains. (Jurisdiction, Laws, Courts)

3.      Economic liberty without any inequality. ($$$)

 

 

The Moroccan Royal Flush: (Same-Suit)

 

1.      Moroccan Empire of Morocco Constitution 2024 - (Ace)

2.      Moroccan Act of Algeciras 1906 - (King)

3.      Moroccan Madrid Convention 1880 – (Queen)

4.      Moroccan Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1836 – (Jack)

5.      Moroccan Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1786 – (Ten)

 

·       mis·pri·sion

noun law

  1. the deliberate concealment of one's knowledge of a treasonable act or a felony.

 

·       mal·fea·sance

[malˈfēzns]

noun

law

malfeasance (noun)

  1. wrongdoing, especially by a public official:

"the mayor was accused of malfeasance"

Similar:

deceit

deception

duplicity

lying

falseness

falsity

falsehood

untruthfulness

fraud

fraudulence

sharp practice

cheating

chicanery

craft

cunning

trickery

artifice

artfulness

wiliness

guile

double-dealing

underhandedness

subterfuge

skulduggery

treachery

perfidy

unfairness

unjustness

improbity

rascality

untrustworthiness

dishonor

unscrupulousness

corruption

criminality

lawlessness

lawbreaking

misconduct

crookedness

shadiness

foxiness

dirty tricks

shenanigans

monkey business

funny business

hanky-panky

jiggery-pokery

monkeyshines

codology

management

knavery

knavishness

kidology

 

·         INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING RIGHTS OF NATIONALS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN MOROCCO (FRANCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) JUDGMENT OF AUGUST 27th, 1952

·     Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco (France v. United States of America)

·       General Act of Algeciras  


AMPAC Study Session: Study Board 168

Study Session Board 168

 

·         Treaties are the sovereign binding contracts between countries.

·         Treaties are the supreme Law between two or more countries.

·         Only the duly appointed officials of a Country can be authorized to enforce or argue the legal provisions of said treaty.

·         A country is the external state.

·         A State has Governmental Officials.

·         Officials can enforce the treaty.

·         The treaty provisions settle questions of Diversity of Jurisdiction & Law

 

Supremacy Clause

 

Question: What is the purpose and intent of the supremacy clause or

supreme law, and procedure?

 

Answer: The Supremacy Clause or supreme law supersedes, overrule, or preempts inferior laws and inferior procedures.

 

Signatory Powers of Third States parties to the multilateral

Act of Algeciras of 1906 per intertemporal Law

 (General Act of Algeciras )

 

  1. United States of America         2. France

  3. Great Britain                                   4. Germany

  5. Netherlands                                   6. Belgium

  7. All the Russia’s (15 States)    8. Austria-Hungary

  9. Sweden                                         10. Italy

11. Portugal                                      12. Spain

 

 

TREATY. International Law A compact made between two or more inde pendent nations with a view to the public wel fare. Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States, Cust. & Pat.App., 107 F.2d 819, 827; United States v. Bel mont, N.Y., 57 S.Ct. 758, 761, 301 U.S. 324, 81 L. Ed. 1134. 1673 TREATY

An agreement, league, or contract between two

 or more nations or sovereigns, formally signed by

 commissioners properly authorized, and solemnly

 ratified by the several sovereigns or the supreme

 power of each state. 

 A "treaty" is not only a law but also a contract be

tween two nations and must, if possible, be so construed as

 to give full force and effect to all its parts. United States

 v. Reid, C.C.A.Or., 73 F.2d 153, 155.

 Personal treaties relate exclusively to the persons of the

 contracting sovereigns, such as family alliances, and treat

ies guaranteeing the throne to a particular sovereign and

 his family. As they relate to the persons, they expire of

 course on the death of the sovereign or the extinction of

 his family. With the advent of constitutional government

 in Europe these treaties have lost their importance. Real

 treaties relate solely to the subject-matters of the convention,

independently of the persons of the contracting par

ties, and continue to bind the state, although there may

 be changes in its constitution or in the persons of its rul

ers. Boyd's Wheat. Int. Law § 29.

 Private Law

 The discussion of terms which immediately pre

cedes the conclusion of a contract or other tra An agreement, league, or contract between two or more nations or sovereigns, formally signed by commissioners properly authorized, and solemnly ratified by the several sovereigns or the supreme power of each state. Edye v. Robertson, 5 S.Ct. 247, 112 U.S. 580, 28 L.Ed. 798; Ex parte Ortiz, C.C.Minn., 100 F. 962; Charlton v. Kelly, 33 S.Ct. 945, 954, 29 S.Ct. 447, 57 L.Ed. 1274, 46 L.R.A., N.S., 397. A "treaty" is not only a law but also a contract between two nations and must, if possible, be so construed as to give full force and effect to all its parts. United States v. Reid, C.C.A.Or., 73 F.2d 153, 155. Personal treaties relate exclusively to the persons of the contracting sovereigns, such as family alliances, and treaties guaranteeing the throne to a particular sovereign and his family. As they relate to the persons, they expire of course on the death of the sovereign or the extinction of his family. With the advent of constitutional government in Europe these treaties have lost their importance. Real treaties relate solely to the subject matters of the convention, independently of the persons of the contracting part-time parties, and continue to bind the state, although there may be changes in its constitution or in the persons of its rulers. Boyd's Wheat. Int. Law § 29. Private Law The discussion of terms which immediately precedes the conclusion of a contract or other transaction. A warranty on the sale of goods, to be valid, must be made during the "treaty" preceding the sale. Chit. Cont. 419; Sweet.

 TREATY OF PEACE. An agreement or contract

 made by belligerent powers, in which they agree

 to lay down their arms, and by which they stipulate

the conditions of peace and regulate the manner in which it is to

 

Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) | National Archives

Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco (France v. United States of America)

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition

General Act of Algeciras - Wikisource, the free online library

Protectorate Treaty Between France and Morocco

Empire No

an extensive group of states or countries under a single supreme authority

formally especially an Emperor or Empress

The French Ambassador to the Secretary of State 1917

History of the U.S. and Morocco

 

 


Auxiliary

aux·il·ia·ry verb
[ôɡˈzilyerē ˌvərb]
noun
grammar
auxiliary verb (noun) · auxiliary verbs (plural noun)
  1. a verb used in forming the tenses, moods, and voices of other verbs. See also modal verb